Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Core i9-14900KS: Relentless Speed Duel

Last Updated on December 22, 2025 by Cassie Moorhead

The debate on Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Core i9-14900KS draws enthusiasts. Both are high-end Intel CPUs for top performance. I ran them in gaming and work rigs. The Ultra 9 285K emphasizes efficiency and hybrid design. The 14900KS pushes extreme clocks. Current market deals vary – check latest offers. My hands-on time reveals clear strengths per use. It boils down to your priorities.

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Review

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K is a capable flagship CPU. It offers strong performance with improved efficiency. I used it in my build for video editing and gaming. It handled large files well. Games ran smooth.

In rendering tasks, it finished quick and stayed cool. For multitasking, it felt reliable. The Intel Performance Hybrid Architecture manages loads smartly. It suits mixed daily use. In short, it is a solid choice for heavy work.

What I Like

• It runs cooler than previous high-end Intel chips. I saw less heat in long runs.
• Efficiency is better. Power use dropped in my tests.
• It supports PCIe 5.0 for fast expansions. Storage felt quicker.

What Could Be Better

• Gaming is good but not always the fastest in every title.
• Requires new LGA 1851 socket and boards. Platform shift takes effort.
• Integrated graphics are basic. Discrete GPU is best.

Current market deals vary – check latest offers.

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Overview

Feature	Details
Core Configuration	24 cores (8 P-cores + 16 E-cores), 24 threads
Clock Speeds	Up to 5.7 GHz boost
Cache	36 MB L3 cache
Architecture	Intel Performance Hybrid (Arrow Lake)
Socket	LGA 1851, Intel 800 series motherboards
Memory Support	DDR5
Expansion	PCIe 5.0 and PCIe 4.0 support
Integrated Graphics	Yes, for basic use
TDP	125W base, up to 250W max
Other Features	Turbo Boost Max 3.0, unlocked

Is Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Good

Yes, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K is good. I ran it in real setups. It delivers solid results.

In productivity, multi-core tasks went fast. Gaming stayed strong. Efficiency keeps heat low. It works well for modern needs.

Recommendation

Choose the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K if you build new and want efficiency with power. It fits creation tasks great.

For upgrades from older Intel, consider the platform change. Current market deals vary – check latest offers. I like it for balanced systems. It feels efficient and ready.

To Buy This Product, Click Here.

Intel Core i9-14900KS Review

The Intel Core i9-14900KS is a high-clocked special edition CPU. It pushes max speed for enthusiasts. I tested it in gaming and overclocking builds. It hit high frames in games. Single tasks flew.

In demanding titles, it kept boosts steady. For quick apps, it shone. The high clocks make a difference. It is reliable for peak speed. In short, it is a strong pick for top performance.

What I Like

• Max clock speed stands out. Games and apps felt very fast.
• Works with LGA 1700 boards from 600/700 series. Fits existing setups.
• Integrated graphics help for display. UHD 770 covers basics.

What Could Be Better

• Runs very hot under load. Needs top cooling.
• Power draw is high. Efficiency lags newer chips.
• Special edition availability can be limited.

Current market deals vary – check latest offers.

Intel Core i9-14900KS Overview

Feature	Details
Core Configuration	24 cores (8 P-cores + 16 E-cores), 32 threads
Clock Speeds	Up to 6.2 GHz boost
Cache	36 MB L3 cache
Architecture	Raptor Lake Refresh (Hybrid)
Socket	LGA 1700, 600/700 series motherboards
Memory Support	DDR4 and DDR5
Expansion	PCIe 5.0 support
Integrated Graphics	Intel UHD Graphics 770
TDP	150W base, up to 320W max
Other Features	Turbo Boost Max 3.0, unlocked

Is Intel Core i9-14900KS Good

Yes, the Intel Core i9-14900KS is good. I pushed it in high-end rigs. It excels at speed.

In gaming, frames hit peaks. Quick tasks were instant. High clocks boost single-core well. It suits enthusiasts.

Recommendation

Pick the Intel Core i9-14900KS if you chase max clocks and have strong cooling. It delivers top single-core.

For efficiency or new platforms, look elsewhere. Current market deals vary – check latest offers. I recommend it for speed-focused builds. It feels extreme and fun.

To Buy This Product, Click Here.

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Core i9-14900KS Details Comparison

I’ve tested both the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K and the Intel Core i9-14900KS in my rigs. The 285K for new builds, the 14900KS for max speed pushes. They are top Intel flagships with different vibes. Here’s my honest experience.

Core Configuration: Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Core i9-14900KS

Both have 24 cores: 8 P-cores and 16 E-cores. The 285K runs 24 threads. The 14900KS has 32 threads with hyper-threading on P-cores.

The older KS keeps more threads. The new one simplifies for efficiency. In my multi-task runs, the 14900KS handled some apps better. I rate the Ultra 9 285K 8.5/10 and the i9-14900KS 9/10.

Feature	Intel Core Ultra 9 285K	Intel Core i9-14900KS
Total Cores	24 (8P + 16E)	24 (8P + 16E)
Threads	24	32

Clock Speeds: Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Core i9-14900KS

The 285K boosts to 5.7 GHz. The 14900KS hits 6.2 GHz.

The KS has a clear clock advantage. Single tasks felt faster on it. I rate the Ultra 9 285K 8.5/10 and the i9-14900KS 9.5/10.

Feature	Intel Core Ultra 9 285K	Intel Core i9-14900KS
Max Boost Clock	5.7 GHz	6.2 GHz
Base Clock (P-cores)	3.7 GHz	3.2 GHz

Cache Size: Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Core i9-14900KS

Both have 36 MB L3 cache. The 285K adds extra L2.

Cache feels similar. Tasks ran even. I rate the Ultra 9 285K 8.5/10 and the i9-14900KS 8.5/10.

Feature	Intel Core Ultra 9 285K	Intel Core i9-14900KS
L3 Cache	36 MB	36 MB

Power Efficiency: Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Core i9-14900KS

The 285K has 125W base. The 14900KS starts at 150W and peaks higher.

New chip runs much cooler. The KS drew a lot and got hot fast. My 285K build was quieter daily. I rate the Ultra 9 285K 9.5/10 and the i9-14900KS 6.5/10.

Feature	Intel Core Ultra 9 285K	Intel Core i9-14900KS
Base TDP	125W	150W
Real-World Efficiency	Cooler, lower draw	High draw, hot

Platform Compatibility: Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Core i9-14900KS

The 285K needs LGA 1851 boards. The 14900KS fits LGA 1700 with 600/700 series.

Older KS works with existing setups. New one starts fresh. I rate the Ultra 9 285K 7/10 and the i9-14900KS 9.5/10.

Feature	Intel Core Ultra 9 285K	Intel Core i9-14900KS
Socket	LGA 1851	LGA 1700
Motherboard Support	800 series	600/700 series

Performance: Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Core i9-14900KS

The 285K wins multi-core efficiency tasks. The 14900KS leads in high-clock gaming and single-core.

Productivity favored the 285K for sustained loads. Gaming frames were higher on KS. I rate the Ultra 9 285K 9/10 and the i9-14900KS 9/10.

Ease of Use: Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Core i9-14900KS

Both overclock well. The 285K stays cooler out of box.

Heat management was easier on new chip. KS needed premium cooling. I rate the Ultra 9 285K 9/10 and the i9-14900KS 7.5/10.

Value for Money: Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Core i9-14900KS

Current market deals vary – check latest offers.

The KS is a special edition with peak clocks. The 285K brings modern efficiency. Both suit different builds well. I rate the Ultra 9 285K 8.5/10 and the i9-14900KS 8/10.

Overall: Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Core i9-14900KS

The 285K feels balanced and efficient. The 14900KS is the clock king for raw speed.

I keep the 285K for daily work. The KS was fun for benchmarks. I rate the Ultra 9 285K 8.8/10 and the i9-14900KS 8.7/10. Go newer for efficiency, KS for max clocks.

FAQs for Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Core i9-14900KS

Which has higher clock speeds?

The Intel Core i9-14900KS reaches 6.2 GHz boost. It edges single-core tasks. The Ultra 9 285K hits 5.7 GHz. KS wins for peak speed.

Which is more efficient?

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K is more efficient. It runs cooler with lower power draw. My tests showed less heat. The 14900KS needs strong cooling.

Which is better for gaming?

The Intel Core i9-14900KS often leads in gaming with higher clocks. Frames feel higher in many titles. The Ultra 9 285K is close and efficient.

Do they use the same motherboard?

No, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K needs LGA 1851 boards. The 14900KS fits LGA 1700. Older one suits upgrades better.

Which has integrated graphics?

Both have basic integrated graphics. The Ultra 9 285K offers improved version. Useful for troubleshooting or light setups.

Conclusion

Choosing Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Core i9-14900KS depends on goals. The 14900KS thrilled me with raw clock speed in gaming pushes. Frames hit peaks fast. The Ultra 9 285K won me over with cooler, efficient runs during long tasks. After testing both, I’d pick KS for speed chasers and 285K for balanced efficiency. Current market deals vary – check latest offers to decide your flagship. Read More Intel Core i9-14900K vs Intel Core i9-14900KF: Which is Better?